Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 4-37 , January 2003

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of multiple myeloma: An evidence-based review

  • Theresa Hahn

      Affiliations

    • Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • John R. Wingard

      Affiliations

    • University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • Kenneth C. Anderson

      Affiliations

    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • William I. Bensinger

      Affiliations

    • The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • James R. Berenson

      Affiliations

    • Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Greg Brozeit

      Affiliations

    • International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, California
  • ,
  • Joseph R. Carver

      Affiliations

    • Abramson Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Robert A. Kyle

      Affiliations

    • Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Philip L. McCarthy Jr

      Affiliations

    • Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York

Received 18 October 2002 ,Accepted 22 October 2002.

  • Image Result

    Overall survival according to treatment group. The numbers shown below the time points are probabilities of overall survival (the percentages of patients surviving) and 95% confidence intervals. Repri

    Overall survival according to treatment group. The numbers shown below the time points are probabilities of overall survival (the percentages of patients surviving) and 95% confidence intervals. Reprinted with permission [3].

  • Image Result
    Superior EFS (top) and OS (bottom) among 116 newly diagnosed patients receiving “total therapy” (TT) compared with 116 closely matched “pair mates” receiving standard therapy according to SWOG protoco

    Superior EFS (top) and OS (bottom) among 116 newly diagnosed patients receiving “total therapy” (TT) compared with 116 closely matched “pair mates” receiving standard therapy according to SWOG protocols. The median times of follow-up of living patients on TT and SWOG studies are 31 and 63 months, respectively. Reprinted with permission [4].

  • Image Result
    Survival for the intensive therapy group and the control group. The numbers shown below the time points are probabilities of survival in percent, with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. Reprinted w

    Survival for the intensive therapy group and the control group. The numbers shown below the time points are probabilities of survival in percent, with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. Reprinted with permission [5].

  • Image Result
    Partitioned Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to treatment group, ie, early HDT group (top) and late HDT group (bottom). Each plot displays the Kaplan-Meier estimations of time to OS, EFS, and ti

    Partitioned Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to treatment group, ie, early HDT group (top) and late HDT group (bottom). Each plot displays the Kaplan-Meier estimations of time to OS, EFS, and time to end of treatment, either conventional chemotherapy (CCT) or transplantation (HDT), since randomization. Note that 2 EFS were considered in the late HDT group (after conventional chemotherapy, “post-CCT,” and after transplantation, “post-HDT”). The areas between these curves and the vertical line at 58 months, which corresponds to the median follow-up of the whole cohort, represent estimates of the mean durations between these events, namely treatment duration (either CCT [●] or HDT [+]), time without symptoms and treatment toxicity (TWISTT [●]), and time between relapse and death (▨). All patients were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis. IFN was not taken into account because it was usually maintained only when well-tolerated. Reprinted with permission [13].

  • Image Result
    Kaplan-Meier probability of progression-free survival of 188 patients on an intent-to-treat basis. Reprinted with permission [51].

    Kaplan-Meier probability of progression-free survival of 188 patients on an intent-to-treat basis. Reprinted with permission [51].

  • Image Result
    Survival according to treatment arm. Reprinted with permission [73].

    Survival according to treatment arm. Reprinted with permission [73].

  • Image Result
    Event-free survival according to treatment arm. Reprinted with permission [73].

    Event-free survival according to treatment arm. Reprinted with permission [73].

  • Image Result
    Probability of progression-free survival of all patients by the Kaplan-Meier method. Reprinted with permission [138].

    Probability of progression-free survival of all patients by the Kaplan-Meier method. Reprinted with permission [138].

 Correspondence and reprint requests: Theresa Hahn, PhD, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Elm & Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY 14263 (e-mail: Theresa.Hahn@RoswellPark.org).

PII: S1083-8791(02)00005-8

doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2003.50002

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 4-37 , January 2003