Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 12, Issue 2, Supplement 1 , Page 118, February 2006

Intravenous (i.v.) busulfan (Bu) plus melphalan (Mel) is a well-tolerated preparative regimen for stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients (pts) with advanced lymphoid malignancies

  • P. Kebriaei

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • T.L. Madden

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • N. Thapar

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • E.J. Shpall

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • C. Hosing

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • M.H. Qazilbash

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • M. de Lima

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • P.F. Thall

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • S. Wright

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • I.F. Khouri

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • R.E. Champlin

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • R. Jones

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • B.S. Andersson

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Article Outline

 

High dose chemotherapy and SCT is an accepted treatment option for pts with relapsed lymphoid malignancies. However, relapse remains a significant issue for pts with advanced disease. A double alkylating regimen of Bu and Mel has been suggested as an effective and myeloablative pre-transplant conditioning regimen. Historically, oral Bu was used and the combination resulted in considerable mucositis and VOD. Recently, an i.v. formulation of Bu has been developed that has less pharmacokinetic variability. We are investigating the safety and efficacy of i.v. Bu-Mel in pts with lymphoid malignancies undergoing auto- or allo-SCT. Patients and Methods: The conditioning regimen consists of i.v. Bu 130 mg/m2 over 3 hours daily for 4 days, either as a fixed dose per BSA, or to target an average daily AUC of 5000 mMol-min ± 12% determined by a test dose of i.v. Bu at 32 mg/m2 given 48 hours prior to the high dose regimen. After the 4 daily Bu doses, there is a rest day, followed by 2 daily doses of Mel at 70 mg/m2. Stem cells are infused the following day. Dilantin is administered for seizure prophylaxis. GVHD prophylaxis consists of tacrolimus and methotrexate for pts receiving allo-SCT. Results: Twenty-five pts (17 M/8 F) with median age 40 years (range 19–65): MM (n = 5), NHL (n = 5), HD (n = 13), ALL (n = 2). Median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range 1–8). At study entry, 2 pts were in CR1; 23 were in relapse: refractory (n = 3), chemo-sensitive first relapse (n = 9), and beyond first relapse (n = 11). Engraftment, GVHD, and toxicity data are shown in Table 1. Grades I or II mucositis was the most common regimen-related toxicity. Of note, there were no cases of VOD; reversible hyperbilirubinemia, grade II (n = 2) and grade III (n = 1), was observed in 3 pts receiving allo-SCT. All allo-SCT pts had 100% donor chimerism by day 30. Twenty pts had i.v. Bu delivered per test dose guidance; 5 pts received fixed dose Bu at 130 mg/m2. The median daily systemic Bu exposure was 4867 μMol-min. Conclusions Intravenous Bu-Mel is well tolerated and enables prompt neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Individualized PK-directed dosing of i.v. Bu is feasible, and likely contributes to the low toxicity profile of this regimen. Longer follow-up is needed to assess disease control (Table 1).

Table 1. Engraftment, GVHD, and Regimen Toxicities
Auto-SCTAllo-SCT
No. Patients187
Median CD34+ cell dose × 106/kg (range)5.20(2.49–10.48)4.89(2.27–13.31)
Median days to ANC >0.5 × 109/L (range)10(9–11)11(9–19)
Median days to platelet >20 × 109/L (range)9(8–30)12(10–19)
No. patients with grade II–IV acute GVHD02
No. patients with grade III toxicity22
Type grade III toxicitymucositisrenal failure, hyperbilirubinemia
No. Patients with grade IV toxicity00
No. Deaths with 8 month follow-up02
Cause of death disease progression, GVHD

PII: S1083-8791(05)01164-X

doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.11.362

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 12, Issue 2, Supplement 1 , Page 118, February 2006