Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 444-453, April 2007
A Meta-Analysis of Unrelated Donor Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation in Adult and Pediatric Patients
Abstract
Several studies have compared the results of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (UBMT) and unrelated donor cord blood transplantation (UCBT). To objectively analyze these data, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled data on comparative studies of UCBT and UBMT in patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Combining the studies, 161 children and 316 adults undergoing UCBT (mostly 1 or 2 antigen-mismatched), along with 316 children and 996 adults undergoing UBMT (almost entirely fully matched with the recipient), were analyzed. T-cell–depleted UBMT was excluded; where data were available, only fully matched UBMT was used in the analysis. Pooled comparisons of studies of UCBT and UBMT in children found that the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was lower with UCBT (relative risk [RR] = 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12–0.57; P = .16), but the incidence of grade III–IV acute GVHD did not differ (RR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.42–5.03; P = .55). There was no difference in 2-year OS in children when studies were pooled (RR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.31–1.87; P = .55). For adults, transplantation-related mortality (pooled estimate, 1.04; 95% CI = 0.52–2.08; P = .91) and disease-free survival (DFS) (pooled estimate, 0.59; 95% CI = 0.18–1.96; P = .39) were not statistically different. Because of the unavailability of randomized controlled trials, pooled analysis of nonrandomized comparative studies was performed. Thus, our meta-analysis confirmed that UCBT in children and adults had consistently equivalent survival outcomes compared with UBMT despite greater donor–recipient HLA disparity with UCBT.
Key Words: Cord Blood Transplant, Bone Marrow Transplant, Unrelated Donor, Meta-Analysis
PII: S1083-8791(06)00757-9
doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.11.005
© 2007 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 444-453, April 2007
