Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 13, Issue 7 , Pages 778-789, July 2007

Utility of Single versus Tandem Autotransplants for Advanced Testes/Germ Cell Cancer: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis

  • Hillard M. Lazarus

      Affiliations

    • University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests: Hillard M. Lazarus, MD, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • ,
  • Patrick J. Stiff

      Affiliations

    • Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
  • ,
  • Jeanette Carreras

      Affiliations

    • The Solid Tumor Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Brent R. Logan

      Affiliations

    • The Solid Tumor Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Luke Akard

      Affiliations

    • Indiana Blood & Marrow Transplantation, Beach Grove, Indiana
  • ,
  • Brian J. Bolwell

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Richard W. Childs

      Affiliations

    • National Institutes of Hematology, Bethesda, Maryland
  • ,
  • Robert Peter Gale

      Affiliations

    • Center for Advanced Studies in Leukemia
  • ,
  • John P. Klein

      Affiliations

    • The Solid Tumor Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Michael C. Lill

      Affiliations

    • Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Waleska S. Pérez

      Affiliations

    • The Solid Tumor Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Edward A. Stadtmauer

      Affiliations

    • University of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • J. Douglas Rizzo

      Affiliations

    • The Solid Tumor Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Received 25 January 2007; accepted 28 February 2007. published online 01 May 2007.

Abstract 

Tandem autotransplants are used to treat advanced testis cancer patients but their value compared to a single autotransplant is unknown. To evaluate the results of autotransplant in relapsed testicular/germ cell cancer, data from 300 patients undergoing autotransplants 1989-2002 were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. We compared results for those patients intended to undergo tandem autotransplant procedures (N = 102) versus patients in whom a second autotransplant was not planned (N = 198). Five-year survival probability was 35% (95% confidence interval = 25%-46%) in the planned tandem transplant cohort compared to 42% (35%-49%) in the group not planned to have a second transplant (P = .29). Probability of progression-free survival at 5 years for these cohorts was 34% (25%-44%) and 38% (31%-45%), respectively (P = .50). The planned tandem autotransplant cohort had significantly more advanced disease at diagnosis and greater likelihood of cisplatin resistance. Patients intended to receive tandem transplants had a lower treatment-related mortality at 1 year (3% versus 10%, P = .02). Using propensity score analysis the planned tandem autotransplant cohort had significantly lower treatment-related mortality (P = .044) but no different risk of relapse (P = .541) compared to the planned single transplant cohort. Tandem autotransplants for testicular cancer are associated with less treatment-related mortality than a planned single transplant, with no differences in disease-related outcomes or overall survival at 3 years. Patient selection bias for either transplant approach, however, may affect the results of this observational study; a randomized trial is needed to determine which approach, if either, is better.

Key Words: Testis cancer, Germ cell cancer, Tandem autotransplant

 

PII: S1083-8791(07)00193-0

doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.02.013

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 13, Issue 7 , Pages 778-789, July 2007