Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 13, Issue 7 , Pages 765-770, July 2007

Ganciclovir Inhibits Lymphocyte Proliferation by Impairing DNA Synthesis

  • Minoo Battiwalla

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests: Minoo Battiwalla, MD, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14202.
  • ,
  • Yiyuan Wu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Rajinder P.S. Bajwa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Marija Radovic

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Nikolaos G. Almyroudis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Brahm H. Segal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Paul K. Wallace

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Ryotaro Nakamura

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology/Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, California
  • ,
  • Swaminathan Padmanabhan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Theresa Hahn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
  • ,
  • Philip L. McCarthy Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York

Received 14 December 2006; accepted 20 March 2007. published online 10 May 2007.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease-related mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients has dramatically declined because of ganciclovir prophylaxis and preemptive therapeutic strategies. However, ganciclovir has not improved overall survival in randomized studies despite effectively preventing overt CMV disease. Moreover, recurrent posttransplant CMV antigenemia, associated with prolonged ganciclovir exposure, is a predictor of increased relapse of malignancy. We examined the hypothesis that ganciclovir itself may have a negative impact on immune reconstitution by testing the effect of ganciclovir on normal human lymphocytes in vitro. T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation, as measured by PHA-induced 3H-thymidine uptake, was greatly reduced at therapeutic concentrations of ganciclovir (10 μg/mL) but not for foscarnet (300 μM/L). Moreover, ganciclovir impaired bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in proliferating lymphocytes, but did not impair lymphocyte survival or induce lymphocyte apoptosis. Collectively, these results show that ganciclovir suppresses T-lymphocyte proliferation in vitro by inhibiting DNA synthesis; with implications for T-lymphocyte function following allogeneic BMT.

Key Words: CMV, Ganciclovir, DNA polymerase

 

Back to Article Outline

Introduction 

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has historically been a major contributor to mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) [1]. With the introduction of ganciclovir, prophylactic, and preemptive antiviral strategies have greatly reduced the incidence of breakthrough CMV organ disease and mortality to about 5% [2, 3, 4]. Despite impressive reduction in CMV-related mortality, several studies have shown that CMV seropositive patients continue to have higher mortality than patient-donor pairs who are both CMV seronegative [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Reasons cited for this observation include: (1) predisposing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); (2) antiviral toxicities (myelosuppression with ganciclovir; renal dysfunction with foscarnet and cidofovir); (3) infections related to ganciclovir-induced neutropenia; and (4) CMV itself disabling immune reconstitution.

Ganciclovir is a nucleoside analog of guanosine that competitively inhibits the incorporation of dGTP by viral DNA polymerase [10]. However, this effect is only partially specific for the viral polymerase because ganciclovir also inhibits DNA synthesis in hematopoietic progenitors [11]. Although cytopenias are a well-recognized complication of ganciclovir therapy, the possibility of direct lymphocyte inhibition has escaped attention, perhaps because ganciclovir is usually employed in subjects with a preexisting quantitative or qualitative impairment of cellular immunity. Ganciclovir has been previously shown to inhibit in vitro proliferative responses to cytomegalovirus antigen and to phytohemagglutinin by greater than 50% [5]. The purpose of our study is to define the mechanism by which ganciclovir inhibits T cell proliferation.

Back to Article Outline

Material and Methods 

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) 

Blood samples were obtained from consenting normal adult volunteers and PBMCs extracted by Ficoll-Paque centrifugation. This study was approved by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute Review Board.

Lymphocyte Proliferation Assays 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were suspended in RPMI-CM supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% AB-serum at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/mL. Lymphocytes were stimulated with 10% PHA (T-Stim, BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA), or with 5 μL/mL cytomegalovirus lysate (ABI, Columbia, MD), and incubated for 5 days at 37°C with 5% CO2. Ganciclovir (Roche, Nutley, NJ), foscarnet (Abbot Labs, Chicago, IL) or tacrolimus (Astellas, Tokyo, Japan) were added to achieve final concentrations equal to their peak therapeutic concentrations achieved in vivo (10 μg/mL, 300 μM/L, and 10 ng/mL, respectively), and concentrations 5-fold lower or 5-fold higher. One hundred microliters of cellular suspension were placed in quadruplicate in wells of a 96-well plate. Lymphocyte proliferation in response to these stimulators was assessed by a standard [3H] Thymidine uptake assay. Experiments were performed on PBMCs collected from 3 different healthy voluntary donors on 2 separate occasions.

Survival and Apoptosis 

The survival of unstimulated PBMCs in the presence or absence of ganciclovir was assessed using an automated cell counter (Hematology System ADVIA120, Bayer). Fresh PBMCs were incubated in RPMI-CM supplemented with 10% AB-serum at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 days. Cells were counted for total and % lymphocytes on days 0, 1, 3, and 4.

Apoptosis was assessed using the Raji Lymphoblastic Leukemia cell line and with normal human PBMCs. Raji cells (unstimulated) or PBMCs induced to proliferate with 10% PHA (T-Stim, BD Biosciences), or with 5 μL/mL Epstein Barr Virus lysate (ABI), were treated with varying concentrations (25 or 125 μg/mL) and durations (12, 24, and 48 hours) of ganciclovir. HD10 antibody (10 mg/mL for 2 hours) was used with the Raji cells as a positive control. Cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and Propidium Iodide (PI) and analyzed by flow cytometry. (BD Biosciences apoptosis kit).

Cell Cycle Analysis 

Resting or PHA-stimulated PBMCs, were incubated for 5 days. Ganciclovir (30-120 μg/mL) was added after days 1, 3, or 4. At the end of a 5-day incubation, cells were pulsed with 20 μM of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) for 30 minutes. Cell cycle analysis was performed using the BrdU-Flow Kit using manufacturer’s instructions (BD-Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). The experiment was repeated using cells from 3 different individuals on separate occasions for confirmation.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Lymphocyte Proliferation 

Lymphocyte proliferation experiments demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition of thymidine uptake by ganciclovir in all individuals (Figure 1). However, foscarnet did not inhibit lymphocyte proliferation even at 1500 μM/L, 5-fold the therapeutic concentration. Tacrolimus uniformly suppressed proliferative responses at all concentrations (2-50 ng/mL). The extent of inhibition by GCV when lymphocytes were stimulated with CMV antigen was 59.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9-66.5%) (P < .001 by the paired t-test) compared with PHA-stimulation 37% (95% CI, 27.5-47.2%P (P < .001 by the paired t-test). The difference between the inhibition of proliferation using CMV antigen and PHA as stimuli was statistically significant.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 1. 

    Effect of ganciclovir, foscarnet, and tacrolimus on 3H incorporation in normal human PBMCs stimulated with PHA (A) or CMV antigen (B). Values are medians; error bars represent SEM. The stimulation index (SI) was determined by dividing the average of the experimental results of each quadruplicate by the average of the unstimulated cells on the same plate.

Survival and Apoptosis Assays 

Ganciclovir had no effect on the survival of unstimulated PBMCs, either total or % lymphocytes at any time point compared to controls. Ganciclovir did not induce apoptosis of Raji cells or of stimulated normal peripheral blood lymphocytes even at 5-fold the therapeutic concentration (Figure 2).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 2. 

    Effect of ganciclovir on apoptosis. Raji cell line with media alone, ganciclovir, or HD10 (A,B). Normal human PBMCs either resting or stimulated by PHA or EBV-antigen with varying concentrations of ganciclovir (C). Values are medians; error bars represent SEM.

Cell Cycle Analysis 

Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into PHA-stimulated lymphocytes was greatly reduced by ganciclovir. Reduction of S-phase BrdU incorporation ranged between 56%-64%. The effect was not seen for periods of incubation with ganciclovir for 24 hours or less and was pronounced for ganciclovir exposures greater than 72 hours (Figure 3).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 3. 

    Normal human PBMCs in RPMI-CM 10% AB-serum were exposed to ganciclovir (30 μg/mL) for 1, 3, or 4 days followed by 30 minutes of BrdU exposure. Anti-BrdU-FITC antibody and 7-AAD were used to determine the stage in the cell cycle. A lymphocyte gate was applied on the basis of FSC and SSC. FL3-W versus FL3-A doublet discrimination was applied. BrdU incorporation was measured by flow cytometry after application of a lymphogate by FSC/SSC properties and elimination of doublet cells. The proportion of cells in apoptosis, G0/G1, S-phase, and G2/M are shown in these representative panels (A). The median percentages ± SEM for cells in cycle (G2+S) or S-phase alone under various conditions are shown (B).

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

We found that ganciclovir directly inhibited T cell proliferation induced by various stimuli at therapeutic concentrations in a dose dependent fashion as previously reported. We observed that CMV-antigen driven lymphocyte proliferation was inhibited to a greater extent than PHA-induced proliferation. This is probably related to the relative strength of the stimuli; powerful stimuli like PHA can overwhelm the moderate immunosuppressive property of ganciclovir. Ganciclovir did not reduce survival of unstimulated PBMCs, nor did it induce apoptosis. We demonstrate that the mechanism by which ganciclovir inhibits T cell proliferation is by inhibition of DNA synthesis.

Ganciclovir triphosphate competitively inhibits the incorporation of deoxyguanosine-triphosphate (dGTP) into viral DNA, resulting in the intranuclear accumulation of short DNA fragments [12, 13]. Selectivity for viral DNA polymerase relates to the >10-fold higher concentration achieved in CMV-infected cells [14]. The inhibitory effect of ganciclovir on BrdU incorporation demonstrated in the present study can be interpreted in light of the above mechanism as evidence that ganciclovir affects lymphocyte function by impairing DNA synthesis at the therapeutic concentrations achieved in vivo.

Ganciclovir is the traditional first-line agent for CMV reactivation, partly because of its familiar and relatively favorable safety profile. However, in a large randomized multicenter trial of 203 patients comparing foscarnet with ganciclovir as preemptive therapy for CMV-reactivation, foscarnet was shown to be equally effective with no greater toxicity [15]. Long-term survival data were not presented in that study. In contrast to ganciclovir, foscarnet directly inhibits DNA polymerase in a noncompetitive manner; selectivity for viral DNA polymerase results from its 100-fold greater inhibitory effect on viral rather than cellular DNA polymerase [16, 17]. This finding may explain the neutral effect of foscarnet in the proliferation assay in the present study.

The consequences of the immunomodulatory effect of ganciclovir are potentially serious in the HSCT setting. Ultimately, suppression of CMV reactivation requires the expansion of donor-derived CMV-specific T cells from the stem cell graft [18, 19, 20]. Prolonged antiviral therapy is known to impair the acquisition of full CMV immunity by suppressing antigen production resulting in late CMV reactivation [21]. Although this effect is not confined to ganciclovir, the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferative responses by ganciclovir could contribute to the late CMV reactivations. Of greater concern is the potential impairment of the graft-versus-leukemia response accounting for the higher incidence of relapse seen in patients with multiple reactivations of CMV [22]. The impact of the immunosuppressive effect of GCV relative to traditional risk factors for disease relapse such as the remission status prior to transplant, extent of immune suppression, and the presence of GVHD remains to be conclusively determined.

The previously unsuspected impairment of immune reconstitution by ganciclovir may explain another inconsistency in the HSCT literature. Ganciclovir is several-fold more active than acyclovir in vitro and in vivo against CMV. Prophylactic and preemptive ganciclovir have resulted in reduced CMV-infection related mortality, but no benefit on overall survival (OS). However, high-dose acyclovir prophylaxis has led to improved OS, although it is less effective than ganciclovir in suppressing CMV reactivation [23, 24]. Although this is an intriguing observation, high-dose acyclovir has not been compared in a randomized fashion to ganciclovir.

In conclusion we show that ganciclovir exerts significant inhibitory effects on lymphocyte proliferation by inhibiting DNA synthesis. Further studies are required to determine whether these in vitro effects translate into impaired immune reconstitution in patients. Medications should be carefully evaluated for immunological effects in the clinical practice of HSCT.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgments 

This work was independent of commercial support. Flow cytometry was performed at Roswell Park Cancer Institute’s Flow Cytometry Laboratory, which was established in part by equipment grants from the NIH Shared Instrument Program, and receives support from the Core Grant (5 P30 CA016056-29) from the National Cancer Institute to the Roswell Park Cancer Institute. We thank Francisco Hernandez, MD, for the gift of the Raji cell line and the HD10 antibody, and Earl Timm, PhD, for his expertise with flow cytometry.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Meyers JD, Flournoy N, Thomas ED. Risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection after human marrow transplantation. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:478–488
  2. Goodrich JM, Mori M, Gleaves CA, et al. Early treatment with ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1601–1607
  3. Boeckh M, Bowden RA, Gooley T, Myerson D, Corey L. Successful modification of a pp65 antigenemia-based early treatment strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients. Blood. 1999;93:1781–1782
  4. Boeckh M, Gooley TA, Myerson D, Cunningham T, Schoch G, Bowden RA. Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study. Blood. 1996;88:4063–4071
  5. Bowden RA, Digel J, Reed EC, Meyers JD. Immunosuppressive effects of ganciclovir on in vitro lymphocyte responses. J Infect Dis. 1987;156:899–903
  6. Craddock C, Szydlo RM, Dazzi F, et al. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity adversely influences outcome after T-depleted unrelated donor transplant in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: the case for tailored graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Br J Haematol. 2001;112:228–236
  7. McGlave PB, Shu XO, Wen W, et al. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: 9 years’ experience of the national marrow donor program. Blood. 2000;95:2219–2225
  8. Meijer E, Dekker AW, Rozenberg-Arska M, Weersink AJ, Verdonck LF. Influence of cytomegalovirus seropositivity on outcome after T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: contrasting results between recipients of grafts from related and unrelated donors. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:703–712
  9. Nichols WG, Corey L, Gooley T, Davis C, Boeckh M. High risk of death due to bacterial and fungal infection among cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of stem cell transplants from seropositive donors: evidence for indirect effects of primary CMV infection. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:273–282
  10. Cheng YC, Huang ES, Lin JC, et al. Unique spectrum of activity of 9-[(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxy)methyl]-guanine against herpesviruses in vitro and its mode of action against herpes simplex virus type 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:2767–2770
  11. Sommadossi JP, Carlisle R. Toxicity of 3′-azido-3′-deoxythymidine and 9-(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxymethyl)guanine for normal human hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:452–454
  12. Hamzeh FM, Lietman PS. Intranuclear accumulation of subgenomic noninfectious human cytomegalovirus DNA in infected cells in the presence of ganciclovir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1818–1823
  13. Reid R, Mar EC, Huang ES, Topal MD. Insertion and extension of acyclic, dideoxy, and ara nucleotides by herpesviridae, human alpha and human beta polymerases (A unique inhibition mechanism for 9-(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxymethyl)guanine triphosphate). J Biol Chem. 1988;263:3898–3904
  14. Freitas VR, Smee DF, Chernow M, Boehme R, Matthews TR. Activity of 9-(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxymethyl)guanine compared with that of acyclovir against human, monkey, and rodent cytomegaloviruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;28:240–245
  15. Reusser P, Einsele H, Lee J, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of foscarnet versus ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2002;99:1159–1164
  16. Crumpacker CS. Mechanism of action of foscarnet against viral polymerases. Am J Med. 1992;92:3S–7S
  17. Oberg B. Antiviral effects of phosphonoformate (PFA, foscarnet sodium). Pharmacol Ther. 1989;40:213–285
  18. Quinnan GV, Burns WH, Kirmani N, et al. HLA-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes are an early immune response and important defense mechanism in cytomegalovirus infections. Rev Infect Dis. 1984;6:156–163
  19. Reusser P, Riddell SR, Meyers JD, Greenberg PD. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response to cytomegalovirus after human allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: pattern of recovery and correlation with cytomegalovirus infection and disease. Blood. 1991;78:1373–1380
  20. Gratama JW, van Esser JW, Lamers CH, et al. Tetramer-based quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in T-cell-depleted stem cell grafts and after transplantation may identify patients at risk for progressive CMV infection. Blood. 2001;98:1358–1364
  21. Li CR, Greenberg PD, Gilbert MJ, Goodrich JM, Riddell SR. Recovery of HLA-restricted cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell responses after allogeneic bone marrow transplant: correlation with CMV disease and effect of ganciclovir prophylaxis. Blood. 1994;83:1971–1979
  22. Nakamura R, Battiwalla M, Solomon S, et al. Persisting posttransplantation cytomegalovirus antigenemia correlates with poor lymphocyte proliferation to cytomegalovirus antigen and predicts for increased late relapse and treatment failure. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004;10:49–57
  23. Prentice HG, Gluckman E, Powles RL, et al. Impact of long-term acyclovir on cytomegalovirus infection and survival after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (European Acyclovir for CMV Prophylaxis Study Group). Lancet. 1994;343:749–753
  24. Prentice HG, Gluckman E, Powles RL, et al. Long-term survival in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients following acyclovir prophylaxis for CMV infection (The European Acyclovir for CMV Prophylaxis Study Group). Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;19:129–133

PII: S1083-8791(07)00219-4

doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.03.009

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 13, Issue 7 , Pages 765-770, July 2007