Journal Home
Search for

Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 853-862 (July 2007)


View previous. 17 of 21 View next.

Cyclophosphamide following Targeted Oral Busulfan as Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Pharmacokinetics, Liver Toxicity, and Mortality

Jeannine S. McCune13Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Ami Batchelder1, H. Joachim Deeg12, Ted Gooley1, Scott Cole1, Brian Phillips1, H. Gary Schoch1, George B. McDonald12

Received 25 January 2007; accepted 29 March 2007.

Abstract 

The pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide (CY) and its metabolites hydroxycyclophosphamide and carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard were determined in 75 patients receiving targeted oral busulfan followed by i.v. CY (TBU/CY) and in 147 patients receiving i.v. CY followed by total body irradiation (CY/TBI) in preparation for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In the TBU/CY patients only, the association of the pharmacokinetic data with liver toxicity, relapse, and survival was evaluated. CY was infused at 60 mg/kg/day over 1 or 2 hours on 2 consecutive days; the majority of patients had BU levels targeted to a steady state plasma concentration (Css) of 800-900 ng/mL. Systemic exposure (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) of CY, hydroxycyclophosphamide, and carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard was measured. Liver toxicity was assessed as the development of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). CY metabolism was highly variable and age dependent. TBU/CY-treated patients had lower AUCCY (P < .0001), higher AUCHCY (P < .0001), and higher AUCCEPM (P = .15) than CY/TBI-conditioned patients. Among patients receiving TBU/CY, 17 (23%) developed SOS, and there were no statistically significant associations between the AUC of CY or its metabolites and SOS, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, or survival (all P >.15). In conclusion, CY exhibits conditioning-regimen dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, suggesting that lowering CY doses is unlikely to improve outcomes to TBU/CY. Alternative strategies, such as administering i.v. busulfan or CY before BU, should be explored.

1 Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

2 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

3 University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests: Jeannine S. McCune, PharmD, Department of Pharmacy, Box 357630, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

PII: S1083-8791(07)00236-4

doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.03.012


View previous. 17 of 21 View next.