« Previous
Next »
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 13, Issue 12
, Pages
1499-1507
, December 2007
Comparable Outcomes after Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Unrelated and Related Donors
-
Cumulative incidence of recurrent malignancy and NRM according to HCT CI and relapse risk categories. The combined groups of patients with MRDs and URDs were categorized according to the presence of p
Cumulative incidence of recurrent malignancy and NRM according to HCT CI and relapse risk categories. The combined groups of patients with MRDs and URDs were categorized according to the presence of pretransplantation comorbidities (HCT CI: 0, 1-2, or ≥ 3) [18] (A, B) and the predicted risk of recurrent malignancy (low, intermediate, or high) [35] (C, D). The cumulative incidence rates of recurrent malignancy (A, C) and NRM (B, D) are shown for respective subgroups of patients.
-
NRM, relapse or progression, and OS according to donor type. Cumulative incidence of NRM (A) and relapse or progression (B), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (C) in patients with HLA-identical siblNRM, relapse or progression, and OS according to donor type. Cumulative incidence of NRM (A) and relapse or progression (B), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (C) in patients with HLA-identical sibling donors (“MRD,” n = 221) compared with those with URDs (“URD,” n = 184; P = .08). The third curve in each panel (“URD adjusted”) shows the projected survival with URDs after adjusting for HCT CI, relapse risk category, patient age, stem cell source, previous CMV infection, and donor–recipient sex mismatch.
PII: S1083-8791(07)00441-7
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.09.004
© 2007 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 13, Issue 12
, Pages
1499-1507
, December 2007
