Risk Factor Analysis of Outcomes after Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Patients with Hurler Syndrome

Article Outline

• Abstract
• Introduction
• Patients and Methods
  • Data Collection
  • Criteria of Patient's Selection
  • Definitions and Endpoints
  • Statistical Analysis
• Results
  • Patients, Donor, and Transplant Characteristics
  • Neutrophil and Platelets Recovery and Chimerism
  • aGVHD and cGVHD
  • EFS and OS
  • Causes of Death
• Discussion
• Acknowledgments
• References
• Copyright

Abstract 

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is considered effective in preventing disease progression in patients with Hurler syndrome (HS). Unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) grafts are suggested as an alternative to bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). We studied 93 HS patients receiving an UCB graft to analyze risk factors for outcomes. The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 4.6 months, median follow-up was 29 months, and median number of nucleated CB cells infused was 7.6 × 10⁷/kg. Most of the patients received 1 or 2 HLA disparate grafts, and the most frequently used conditioning regimen was cyclophosphamide + busulfan (Bu/Cy). All patients received anti-T cell antibody. At post transplant day +60, the cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 85%. A younger age at transplant and a higher CD34⁺ dose at infusion were favorably associated with engraftment. With the exception of 2 patients, all engrafted patients achieved full and sustained donor chimerism. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70% and 77%, respectively. In a multivariate analyses, use of Bu/Cy and a shorter interval from diagnosis to transplant were predictors for improved EFS rate (82% for patients transplanted within 4.6 months after diagnosis compared to 57% for the rest). Improved outcomes from early transplantation and immediate availability of CB unit lead us to conclude that CB transplantation is a beneficial option, which should be considered expediently for children with HS.

Key Words: Hurler syndrome, (Umbilical) cord blood, Stem cell transplantation

Back to Article Outline

Introduction 

Hurler syndrome (HS) is the most severe phenotype in the spectrum of mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), a type of lysosomal storage disorder. These patients develop progressive and ultimately fatal multisystem deterioration, including psychomotor retardation, severe skeletal manifestations, and life-threatening cardiac and pulmonary complications because of severe deficiency or complete absence of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-L-iduronidase [1]. Because enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), available for MPS I patients since 2003, is not able to prevent central nervous system deterioration, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is still considered as the treatment of choice in patients with HS 2, 3.

Worldwide, over 500 SCTs have been performed in HS patients, making HS the most frequently transplanted inborn error of metabolism (IEM) 4, 5. Although significant successful clinical results have been reported in HS patients after SCT, provided the transplantation was performed early in life [6], the success of SCT has been limited by donor availability, high rates of graft failure, mixed chimerism, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality (TRM) [7]. To reduce these limitations, a risk factor analysis was performed in HS patients registered in the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database [7]. In this European retrospective study, both T cell depletion and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen were found to be risk factors for graft failure, whereas busulphan (Bu) pharmacokinetic targeting protected against graft failure. Recent studies, using cord blood (CB) as a stem cell source for SCT in IEM, showed high rates of full donor chimerism associated with normal enzyme levels postengraftment 8, 9, 10, 11. Because full donor chimerism and normal enzyme levels are suggested to be associated with a superior neurocognitive outcome after SCT, CB has been proposed as an alternative option or even preferential stem cell source in HS patients [6]. Still, little is known about the risk factors influencing various measures of outcome in HS patients after unrelated CB transplantation.

To be able to study a large series of HS patients and to perform a risk factor analysis for myelogenous engraftment and event-free survival (EFS) after unrelated CB transplantation, we conducted a collaborative retrospective analysis of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) performed in HS patients treated in multiple centers in Europe and at Duke University in the United States.

Back to Article Outline

Patients and Methods 

Data Collection 

This retrospective analysis is based on data reported to the Eurocord Registry from European and non-European centers through a standardized questionnaire that includes information about the patients, CB units, diseases, and transplant outcomes. Data from Duke University was collected for all consecutive transplants performed and registered to the institutional stem cell transplantation database and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The collected information was reviewed by 2 physicians and checked for computerized errors to ensure data quality. Overlaps between Eurocord database and Duke University were checked to eliminate overlap or duplicative reporting. All parents and or legal guardians of patients gave informed consent for UCBT according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The present study was approved by the Eurocord and Working Party Inborn Errors of European Blood and Marrow transplant group (EBMT). Patients treated at Duke University Medical Center were enrolled on treatment protocols approved by the hospital's institutional review board. Fourteen of the Duke patients were enrolled on the Cord Blood Transplantation Study (COBLT) supported by the National Heart, Lung Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

Criteria of Patient's Selection 

The following criteria were required: (1) diagnosis of HS was confirmed by an increased urinary glycosaminoglycan excretion, a deficiency or absence of alpha-L-iduronidase in peripheral blood leukocytes, and the clinical phenotype; (2) transplantation with a nonexpanded, single, unrelated CB unit; (3) complete clinical data with at least 3 months of posttransplant follow-up; (4) transplants using myeloablative conditioning regimen performed between 1995 and 2007.

Definitions and Endpoints 

The main endpoints were (1) EFS, defined as the time from transplantation to autologous reconstitution, graft failure, second transplant, or death; (2) overall survival (OS), defined as the time from transplantation until the date of death. Other endpoints were (1) neutrophil recovery and (2) acute or chronic graft-versus-host disese (aGVHD, cGVHD). Neutrophil recovery was defined as the first day of achieving a neutrophil count of ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L for 3 consecutive days, and graft failure as no sign of neutrophil recovery or transient engraftment of donor cells within 60 days after transplantation or second transplants. HLA matching was scored using low or intermediate resolution typing for HLA Class I A and B and high-resolution typing for DRB1. Chimerism data was available during the first 3 months after UCBT and at last assessment of the patients. Full donor chimerism (on whole blood) was defined as the presence of more than 95% donor-derived hematopoietic cells, mixed chimerism if >10% and <95% were of donor origin and autologous recovery if <10% of cells were donor-derived cells. Data on the methodology of chimerism detection was not available. Enzymes were regarded normal when levels were normal according to the institutional reference range and heterozygous when the value was below the lower limit of normal but not within the patient range. It was called heterozygous when carriers of the disease are having subnormal enzyme levels as well. aGVHD at day 100 was diagnosed and graded according to published criteria [12] and cGVHD at 2 years was graded according to standard criteria [13] and evaluated in patients who survived at least 100 days with sustained engraftment.

Statistical Analysis 

The duration of follow-up was the time to the last assessment for survivors. To analyze risk factors for outcomes, we considered variables associated with the recipient (median age at transplant, median weight at time of transplantation, sex, pretransplant cytomegalovirus [CMV] serology status), the disease (median interval time from diagnosis to transplant, use of “enzyme replacement therapy” prior to transplant (at least 4 doses), the CB unit (HLA-disparity, and median collected and infused total nucleated cell [TNC] and CD34⁺ cell doses), and the transplant (year of transplant, use of Bu/cyclophosphamide (CY), and the type of GVHD prophylaxis). Because of sample size, the median interval between diagnosis and CBT, median collected and infused nucleated cells, and CD34⁺ were taken to dichotomize the group. Cumulative incidence curves were used for neutrophil recovery, aGVHD, and cGVHD in a competing risk setting, because death is a competing event [14]. Gray test was used for univariate comparisons [15]. Probabilities of EFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate; the 2-sided log-rank test was used for univariate comparisons.

Factors associated with a P-value <.10 by univariate analysis (which are described in the Results section) and other relevant factors such as HLA matching and cell dose were included in multivariate analyses, using Cox proportional hazards for EFS and OS, and proportional subdistribution hazard regression model of Fine and Gray for neutrophil recovery [16]. Then, a stepwise regression was performed using a threshold of .05. All tests were 2-sided. The type I error rate was fixed at .05 for determination of factors associated with time to event outcomes. Risk factor analysis for aGVHD and cGVHD was not performed because of the relative small number of events. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and S-Plus (MathSoft, Inc, Seattle, WA) software packages.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Patients, Donor, and Transplant Characteristics 

Ninety-three patients with HS receiving an unrelated CBT between 1995 and 2007 met the eligibility criteria in the EUROCORD and Duke databases. The baseline patient, donor, and transplantation characteristics are shown in Table 1. Overall, the patients were young and small, with a median age of 1.3 years and median weight of 11.5 kg. The majority of patients were serologically negative for CMV pretransplant. The majority of patients were transplanted with HLA mismatched grafts at 1 (54%) or 2 (27%) loci. Two patients had received a previous unsuccessful BM transplant. A total of 40 patients of this report have been previously published 7, 8, 9, 10.

Table 1. Baseline Patient, Donor, and Transplantation Characteristics

Bu indicates busulphan; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CsA, cyclosporine; Cy, cyclophosphamide; GVHD, graft-versus-host-disease; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; kg, kilogram; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; NC, nucleated cells; Pred, prednisolone; SCT, stem cell transplantation.

The majority of children were conditioned with myeloablative chemotherapy using Bu/Cy with antityymocyte globulin (ATG) (89%) or Campath-1H. All patients received cyclosporine (CsA) containing prophylaxis against GVHD with steroids (75%) as the most common second agent. Given their small size and young age, these patients were transplanted with relatively large doses of cord blood cells, median 10.4 × 10⁷ cells/kg at collection and 7.6 × 10⁷ cells/kg infused. Likewise, the delivered (infused) median CD34 dose was 2.6 × 10⁵/kg.

Neutrophil and Platelets Recovery and Chimerism 

Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of neutrophil recovery at day 60 was 85%, with 82% engrafting at or before day 42. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 22 days (10-46). In a univariate analysis probability of neutrophil recovery had a positive impact from (1) younger age at SCT (95% for <1.3 years and 78% for ≥1.3 years; P = .04); (2a) higher CD34⁺ cell dose at infusion (91% for >2.6 × 10⁵/kg at infusion and 81% for <2.6 × 10⁵/kg at infusion; P = .004); (2b) higher CD34⁺ cell dose at collection (95% for >3.6 × 10⁵/kg at infusion and 79% for <3.6 × 10⁵/kg at infusion; P = .001); (3) year of transplantation (<2004: 79% versus ≥2004: 91%, P = .05). Of note, all 13 patients in this series receiving an HLA identical (6 of 6) CB graft recovered neutrophil (median 22, range: 10-46 days: same as for the whole group) recovery compared to 82% for the remainder of patients (P = ns). In multivariate analysis, younger age at transplantation and high infused (postthaw) CD34⁺ cell dose were independent predictors of early neutrophil recovery (P = .01 and P = .002, respectively; Table 3).

Eleven patients experienced either autologous reconstitution (n = 6) or secondary graft failure (n = 5) during the 3 months after UCBT. Four of these patients subsequently died because of graft failure (3) or disease progression (1). One patient is alive with disease. Six patients were retransplanted. Chimerism data at 3 months posttransplant was available for 73 of the 79 engrafting patients, and showed that 65 were full chimera, whereas 8 had mixed chimerism. At last assessment, chimerism data was available for all 65 patients who were “alive and engrafted.” Sixty-four of them were full chimeras, whereas 2 had mixed but high chimerism (donor chimerism level of 90% and 94% in whole blood cells). Normal alpha-L-iduronidase enzyme level in the blood was found in 97% of “alive and engrafted” patients. The primary and secondary endpoints are further outlined in Table 2.

Table 2. Primary and Secondary Endpoints

EFS indicates event-free survival; GVHD, graft-versus-host-disease; OS, overall survival; CIF, cumulative incidence function.

Table 3. Multivariate Predictors of 3-Year EFS and Neutrophil Recovery after First CBT

CI indicates confidence intervals; Dx, diagnosis; EFS, Event-free survival; HLA, human leucocyte antigen; HR, hazard ratio; NC, nucleated cell; Tx, stem cell transplantation; CBT, cord blood transplantation

aGVHD and cGVHD 

CIF of aGVHD at day 100 was 31% ± 5%. Twenty-five percent of the patients had a maximum grade II, whereas 3% had grade III and 2% had grade IV. Of the many variables analyzed, only the number of TNC infused (20% for <7.6 × 10⁷/kg versus 36% for ≥7.6 × 10⁷/kg; P = .08) appeared to be a predictor for the occurrence of aGVHD. CIF of cGVHD at 3 years was 36% (10 extensive; and 12 limited). HLA matching did not have an impact on the incidence of aGVHD or cGVHD.

EFS and OS 

The probability of 3-year EFS and 3-year OS rate after unrelated CB transplantation were 70% and 77%, respectively. The probability of 3-year EFS (in univariate analyses) was positively influenced by a shorter interval between diagnosis and transplantation (P = .007) and a conditioning regimen containing Bu/Cy (P = .002). Additionally, fully matched (6/6) grafts were associated with 100% EFS (P = .06) compared to 65% ± 7% and 64% ± 10%, for 5/6 and 4/6 matched grafts, respectively. The results are also illustrated by Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test depicted in Figure 1b-d. Importantly, multivariate analysis also demonstrated that both the interval between diagnosis and transplantation as well as the conditioning regimen were statistically associated with better 3-year EFS (P = .046 and P = .011, respectively). HLA-matching was not significant in multivariate analyses (P = .2). In this group of patients receiving relatively high cell doses from the UCB graft, cell dose was not predictive of survival (Table 3). No uni- and multivariate predictors were found concerning the endpoint probability of 3-year OS.

• 
  • View Large Image
  • Download to PowerPoint

• Figure 1 

  Kaplan-Meier curves for neutrophil recovery according to the number of CD34 cells infused/kg (a), EFS according to the delay between diagnosis and transplantation (b), EFS according to the HLA donor-recipient match (c), and EFS according to conditioning regimen before transplantation (d).

Enzyme replacement therapy (given in 23 patients prior to CBT) was not found to be a predictor for any of the endpoints, although there appears to be trend for higher EFS (83 ± 8 versus 63 ± 6: P = .19) and lower GVHD (19 ± 9 versus 35 ± 6: P = .16) in the ERT group. Engraftment was not influenced by ERT.

Causes of Death 

Twenty-one patients (23%) died within 3 years post-SCT, 18 from a transplantation related cause (5 viral infection, 3 hemorrhage, 3 multiorgan failure, 3 graft failure, 2 acute respiratory distress syndrome, 1 GVHD, 1 interstitial pneumonitis), and 1 from disease progression after graft failure. In 2 patients, the cause of death was unknown.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

This Eurocord-Duke University collaborative study on the outcomes of cord blood transplants for HS showed that a shorter interval between diagnosis and transplant and a conditioning regimen containing Bu/Cy predicted higher EFS rate. Importantly, almost all “alive and engrafted” patients achieved full donor chimerism and normal enzymes levels in circulating leukocytes. These findings are particularly important because high donor chimerism and enzyme levels improve long-term functional outcomes of children with HS 6, 17, 18. Despite small numbers, 6/6 matched (class I on low and class II on high resolution) CV grafts may improve the outcome as well. The relatively high rate of cGVHD in this study, although mainly limited, might be a concern.

Similar to findings from other studies 19, 20, 21, a higher and faster neutrophil recovery was associated with CB units providing a higher CD34 cell dose. Although, the CD34 cell dose did not have an impact on the OS or EFS. It is possible that if multiple CB units are available, selecting a unit with a higher cell dose may decrease the time to engraftment and some of the risks associated with prolonged neutropenia. In addition, younger age at transplantation was an individual predictor for higher neutrophil recovery. An explanation for this might be the stage of disease, as GAG storage in the marrow is suggested to be a factor influencing the stem cells homing [22]. Younger children might have less storage in the BM matrix. Also, younger children are physically smaller and tend to receive higher cell doses from the UCB graft.

Until recently, high rates of graft failure and mixed chimerism were reported in studies analyzing the outcome of SCT for HS. A recent European retrospective study showed that these graft failures were mainly associated with RIC regimen and T cell depletion [7]. In this largest study so far, including 146 HS patients, mainly patients receiving BM or PBSC grafts (about 90%) were analyzed. Recently, Prasad et al. [10] demonstrated an 1-year and 5-year OS of 77.3% and 74.5%, respectively, in 45 HS patients receiving a CB transplantation [10]. These results suggest that graft outcomes are at least comparable to the outcomes of non-T-depleted BM/PBSCs transplants (related and unrelated) after myeloablative conditioning reported previously (60%-75%) [7, 17, 23]. A comparison study in this rare disease, including the all HS patients from the CIMBTR, (EMBT) Promise, and Eurocord databases, receiving an unrelated/related BM and unrelated CBT, would be the best way to study the influence of cell source. Although not statistically significant, probably because of small numbers, but in line with other CB studies [21], using HLA-matched cord blood grafts might influence the outcome: all 13 HS patients receiving on intermediate resolution typed fully matched graft are alive and having full donor chimerism in this study. This suggests that in the future, when CB banks have increased their inventory, the outcomes of these transplants might further improve. For HS, and probably for other IEM as well, the rapid availability of an allogeneic donor appears to be essential, because a longer time interval between diagnosis and transplantation negatively influences the EFS rate. This will probably not only influence the graft outcome data, but also the longer term outcomes, because of progression of disease. Obviously, it is important that these patients need to be tolerating full-intensity conditioning. For those who cannot, ERT might be used to improve patients' tolerance of full-intensity conditioning, for example, where there is a severe associated cardiomyopathy [24]. As found in this study, as in others, ERT does not worsen outcome 24, 25, and might therefore be considered in those having a poor clinical condition. In this subgroup of patients it has been shown that ERT can bring them in a better clinical condition [24]. A higher performance scale prior to CBT will probably influence the outcome of this subgroup, as found by others [10]. But for those who can tolerate a full ablative regimen, CBT should not be delayed.

Although the aGVHD and cGVHD rates in this study are similar to children receiving a CBT for acute leukemia [21], this might be a concern because HS patients do not have any advantage from having GVHD. Moreover, it has even been suggested that (extensive) cGVHD might influence the longer term outcomes (eg, neuropsychologic and orthopedic late complications of allogeneic HSCT). In the recently published European series on SCT in HS, reported cGVHD rates were lower, but in that series the proportion of patients with mixed chimerism was high (30%) [7]. Others reported rates similar as found in this cord blood study 17, 26, but these reported data are relatively old in comparison to the European series: worse matching marrow grafts and other transplant practices, like including total body irradiation (TBI) in the conditioning of these young children, might have influenced the GVHD rates as well. On the other hand, in adults, comparing outcomes of matched BM versus CB in a recent meta-analyses showed a favorable effect of using CB on the incidence of cGVHD [27]. Comparison studies of the outcomes (graft outcomes and long-term outcome parameters) of unrelated marrow versus unrelated cord blood versus matched sibling donor, may help resolve the question about the impact of graft source on the incidence of cGVHD. Selection of higher matched donors when the CB banks have extended their inventory or better post-SCT immunosuppressive treatment for this group of patients, might be strategies to influence the occurrence of cGVHD in these children. Limiting the cell dose of the infused CB graft might be a strategy as well, because an infused nucleated cell (NC) dose >7.6 × 10⁷/kg showed to be a trend to higher incidence of GVHD.

High rates of full donor chimerism and normal enzyme levels were found in this study, demonstrating that the use of unrelated cord blood is highly associated with higher sustained engraftment in HS patients compared to patients receiving BM as a stem cell source [28]. In studies using BM, the mixed chimerism rate ranged between 30% and 40%. These high rates of full donor chimerism after CBT have been reported in other studies on “CBT in IEM” as well 8, 9, 10, 11. This is an intriguing observation, and might suggest a stronger “graft-versus-marrow” effect of CB cells in comparison to BM/PBSC. The higher degree of HLA-mismatch of the CB grafts (a majority of 1 or 2 mismatches on intermediate resolution typing), might exert this stronger graft-versus-marrow effect without increasing the rate of GVHD. In other words, the “window” between a strong graft-versus-marrow and clinical GVHD might be wider, probably because of the more naïve phenotype of the T cell in the CB graft. This probably stronger “graft-versus-marrow effect” is in line with the lower incidence of relapses after mismatched CBT in children with acute leukemia in comparison to BM [21]. Alternatively, CB-derived natural killer (NK) cells have been demonstrated to be functionally “mature” with comparison of even better cytolytic activity compared with the BM-derived NK cells 29, 30. This might exert a stronger graft-versus-marrow effect as well. Another explanation might be the more pluripotential capability of the CB stem cell, relative to the adult BM/PB stem cell, with higher proliferative potentials 31, 32, 33. Some animal studies have demonstrated that the addition of mesenchymal stem cells to the SCT product results in less graft rejection, because of the immunomodulating potential of these cells 34, 35. Because mixed chimerism is associated with lower leukocyte enzyme levels, which in turn, leads to worse long-term outcomes, the level of donor chimerism might be an important aspect in the decision on selecting a graft. Further studies to determine the impact of cell source and enzyme levels on the long-term outcomes in neuropsychologic, orthopedic, cardiac, and other organ systems should be carried out.

In conclusion, unrelated cord blood is a good alternative stem cell source for SCT in HS patients, and it might even be the preferred cell source. This is because unrelated cord blood transplantation is (1) associated with full donor chimerism in almost all engrafted patients, which might influence the long-term outcomes; (2) because of its fast availability and the fact that it appears that the interval between diagnoses and transplantation positively influences the outcome. A concern however, might be the relatively higher rate of, mainly limited, cGVHD found in this study. Better matching and selection possibilities in the future might further improve these outcomes by increasing the number of CB units banked.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgments 

We thank our collaborators for sharing patient information: Drs Pierre Bordigoni and Alexandra Salmon (Nancy, France), Mary Coussons (Data manager Manchester, UK), Anne Gahan (Data manager, Dublin, Ireland), Isabelle Hirsch (Data manager, Necker Hospital, Paris), Dr Stefania Varotto (Padua, Italy), Vicky Borbon (Ghent, Belgium), Dr Petr Sedlacek (Prague, Czech Republic), and Dr José Sánchez de Toledo Codina (Barcelona, Spain).

Financial disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Back to Article Outline

References 

1. Neufeld EF, Muenzer J. The mucopolysaccharidosis. In:  Scriver C,  Beaudet A,  Sly W,  Valle D editor. The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001;p. 3421–3452
   • View In Article
2. Wraith JE. The first 5 years of clinical experience with laronidase enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis I. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005;6:489–506
   • View In Article
   • CrossRef
3. Kakkis ED, Muenzer J, Tiller GE, et al. Enzyme-replacement therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis I. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:182–188
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. EBMT registry. http://www.ebmt.org/4Registry/registry1.html. 2007.
   • View In Article
5. IBMTR registry. http://www.cibmtr.org. 2007.
   • View In Article
6. Aldenhoven M, Boelens J, de Koning T. The clinical outcome of Hurler syndrome after stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:88–98
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (293 KB)
   • CrossRef
7. Boelens JJ, Wynn RF, O'Meara A, et al. Outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Hurler's syndrome in Europe: a risk factor analysis for graft failure. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:225–233
   • View In Article
   • CrossRef
8. Staba SL, Escolar ML, Poe M, et al. Cord-blood transplants from unrelated donors in patients with Hurler's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1960–1969
   • View In Article
9. Martin PL, Carter SL, Kernan NA, et al. Results of the cord blood transplantation study (COBLT): outcomes of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation in pediatric patients with lysosomal and peroxisomal storage diseases. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12:184–194
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (415 KB)
   • CrossRef
10. Prasad VK, Mendizabal A, Parikh SH, et al. Unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation for inherited metabolic disorders in 159 pediatric patients from a single center: influence of cellular composition of the graft on transplant outcomes. Blood. 2008;112:2979–2989
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
11. Escolar ML, Poe MD, Provenzale JM, et al. Transplantation of umbilical-cord blood in babies with infantile Krabbe's disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2069–2081
    • View In Article
12. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation. 1974;18:295–304
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med. 1980;69:204–217
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (4599 KB)
    • CrossRef
14. Gooley TA, Lesenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
15. Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann. Stat. 1988;116:1141–1154
    • View In Article
16. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509
    • View In Article
17. Peters C, Shapiro EG, Anderson J, et al. Hurler syndrome: II. Outcome of HLA-genotypically identical sibling and HLAhaploidentical related donor bone marrow transplantation in fifty-four children. The Storage Disease Collaborative Study Group. Blood. 1998;91:2601–2608
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
18. Guffon N, Souillet G, Maire I, et al. Follow-up of nine patients with Hurler syndrome after bone marrow transplantation. J Pediatr. 1998;133:119–125
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • CrossRef
19. Gluckman E, Rocha V. Donor selection for unrelated cord blood transplants. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:565–570
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
20. Wagner JE, Barker JN, DeFor TE, et al. Transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood in 102 patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases: influence of CD34 cell dose and HLA disparity on treatment-related mortality and survival. Blood. 2002;100:1611–1618
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
21. Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Zhang MJ, et al. Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Lancet. 2007;369:1947–1954
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (125 KB)
    • CrossRef
22. Baxter MA, Wynn RF, Schyma L, et al. Marrow stromal cells from patients affected by MPS I differentially support haematopoietic progenitor cell development. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28:1045–1053
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
23. Souillet G, Guffon N, Maire I, et al. Outcome of 27 patients with Hurler's syndrome transplanted from either related or unrelated haematopoietic stem cell sources. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;31:1105–1117
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
24. Cox-Brinkman J, Boelens JJ, Wraith JE, et al. Haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in combination with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in patients with Hurler syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:17–21
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
25. Tolar J, Grewal SS, Bjoraker KJ, et al. Combination of enzyme replacement and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as therapy for Hurler syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41:531–535
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
26. Peters C, Balthazor M, Shapiro EG, et al. Outcome of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation in 40 children with Hurler syndrome. Blood. 1996;87:4894–4902
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
27. Rocha V, Locatelli F. Searching for alternative hematopoietic stem cell donors for pediatric patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41:207–214
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
28. Church H, Tylee K, Cooper A, et al. Biochemical monitoring after haemopoietic stem cell transplant for Hurler syndrome (MPSIH): implications for functional outcome after transplant in metabolic disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39:207–210
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
29. Szabolcs P, Niedzwiecki D. Immune reconstitution in children after unrelated cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:66–72
    • View In Article
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (43 KB)
    • CrossRef
30. Gardiner CM, Meara AO, Reen DJ. Differential cytotoxicity of cord blood and bone marrow-derived natural killer cells. Blood. 1998;91:207–213
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
31. Kogler G, Sensken S, Airey JA, et al. A new human somatic stem cell from placental cord blood with intrinsic pluripotent differentiation potential. J Exp Med. 2004;200:123–135
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
32. Chen N, Hudson JE, Walczak P, et al. Human umbilical cord blood progenitors: the potential of these hematopoietic cells to become neural. Stem Cells. 2005;23:1560–1570
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
33. Meier C, Middelanis J, Wasielewski B, et al. Spastic paresis after perinatal brain damage in rats is reduced by human cord blood mononuclear cells. Pediatr Res. 2006;59:244–249
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
34. Le Blanc K, Ringden O. Immunobiology of human mesenchymal stem cells and future use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:321–334
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (198 KB)
    • CrossRef
35. Ryan JM, Barry FP, Murphy JM, Mahon BP. Mesenchymal stem cells avoid allogeneic rejection. J Inflamm (Lond). 2005;2:8
    • View In Article