Journal Home
Search for

Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 963-970 (August 2009)


View previous. 13 of 20 View next.

Strategies to Improve Long-Term Outcome in Stage IIIB Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Multimodality Treatment Including Dose-Intensive Induction and High-Dose Chemotherapy

Claude Sportès1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Seth M. Steinberg2, David J. Liewehr2, Juan Gea-Banacloche1, David N. Danforth3, Daniele N. Avila1, Kelly E. Bryant1, Michael C. Krumlauf1, Daniel H. Fowler1, Steven Pavletic1, Nancy M. Hardy1, Michael R. Bishop1, Ronald E. Gress1

Received 18 February 2009; accepted 25 April 2009.

Abstract 

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare clinicopathologic entity with a poor prognosis, lagging far behind any other form of nonmetastatic breast cancer. Since the advent of systemic chemotherapy over 35 years ago, only minimal progress has been made in long-term outcome. Although multiple randomized trials of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous progenitor cell transplantation (ASCT) for the treatment of breast cancer have yielded disappointing results, these data are not necessarily relevant to IBC, a distinct clinical and pathologic entity. Therefore, the optimal multimodality therapy for IBC is not well established, and remains unsatisfactory. We treated 21 women with nonmetastatic IBC with a multimodality strategy including high-dose melphalan (Mel)/etoposide and ASCT. The treatment was overall tolerated with acceptable morbidity, and no post-ASCT 100-day mortality. With a median potential follow-up of approximately 8 years, the estimated progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) at 6 years from on-study date are: 67%, 55%, and 69%, respectively. These results from a small phase II study are among the most promising of mature outcome data for IBC. They strongly suggest, along with results of several already published phase II trials, that ASCT could play a significant role in the first line treatment of IBC.

1 Experimental Transplantation & Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

2 Biostatistics & Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

3 Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests: Claude Sportès, MD, Experimental Transplantation & Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center drive, Room 43142, Bethesda, MD 20892-1203.

 Financial disclosure: See acknowledgments on page 969.

PII: S1083-8791(09)00215-8

doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.04.018


View previous. 13 of 20 View next.