Improved Nonrelapse Mortality and Infection Rate with Lower Dose of Antithymocyte Globulin in Patients Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

Article Outline

• Abstract
• Introduction
• Patients and Methods
  • Patient Population
  • Quality Improvement Program
  • Conditioning Regimen, GVHD Prophylaxis, and Supportive Care
  • GVHD Assessment and Treatment
  • Statistical Analysis
• Results
  • Patient Characteristics
  • Engraftment and Chimerism
  • GVHD
  • Infectious Complications
  • NRM and Relapse Rate
  • OS and PFS
• Discussion
• Acknowledgments
• References
• Copyright

We sought to reduce the risk of infectious complications and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) associated with the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) without compromising control of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplantation. As part of an ongoing quality improvement effort, we lowered the dose of rabbit ATG from 7.5 mg/kg of ATG (R-ATG) (n = 39) to 6.0 mg/kg of ATG (r-ATG) (n = 33) in association with fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (BU) RIC transplantation and then monitored patients for adverse events, relapse, and survival. Of the 72 mostly high risk (82%) patients studied, 89% received unrelated donor allografts, 25% of which were HLA-mismatched. No differences in posttransplantation full donor-cell chimerism rates were observed between the 2 ATG-dose groups (P > .05). When R-ATG versus r-ATG patients were compared, we observed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD (32% versus 27%; P = .73) or grade III-IV aGVHD (23% versus 11%; P = .28). However, the r-ATG group had significantly less cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (64% versus 30%; P = .005) and bacterial infections (56% versus 18%; P = .001), a better 1-year cumulative incidence of NRM (18% versus 3%; P = .03), and a trend for better 1-year overall survival (OS) (64% versus 84%; P = .07) compared to R-ATG patients. A seemingly modest reduction in the dose of rabbit ATG did not compromise control of aGVHD or achievement of donor chimerism, but led to a significant decrease in the risk of serious infections and NRM in high-risk RIC allograft recipients.

Key Words: Fludarabine, Busulfan, Thymoglobulin, Antithymocyte globulin, Allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Graft-versus-host disease

Back to Article Outline

Introduction 

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains one of the main factors limiting the wider applicability of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) 1, 2, 3. A variety of strategies have been developed to prevent severe GVHD following either myeloablative (MA) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplantation, including ex vivo T cell depletion (TCD) 4, 5, in vivo TCD with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, calcineurin inhibitors [11], and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, but no consensus has been reached on the superiority of one modality over another.

In vivo TCD by ATG administration is performed by using 1 of the 3 commercially available ATG products (Thymoglobulin^®, ATGAM^®, and ATG-Fresenius^®) [17]. Despite reducing the risk for GVHD, preliminary data suggest that higher ATG doses seem to be associated with increased risk of disease relapse, infectious complications, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) 6, 10. However, only few studies have tried to evaluate the optimal dose intensity of ATG following MA 17, 18, 19, or RIC HSCT [20], and the results of these trials have mostly been inconclusive because of the heterogeneity of the utilized conditioning regimens and ATG administration schedules and the relatively few patients analyzed.

We report here the results of quality improvement efforts designed to compare outcomes associated with 2 moderate doses of rabbit ATG in patients undergoing HSCT following uniform RIC with fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (BU). Our data suggest that a seemingly “modest” reduction in rabbit ATG dose from 7.5 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg leads to a marked reduction in the rates of infectious complications, and provides a significant NRM benefit without compromising GVHD control, engraftment kinetics, and posttransplantation survival.

Back to Article Outline

Patients and Methods 

Patient Population 

Seventy-two consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic HSCT following uniform RIC with Flu, BU, and rabbit ATG, between January 2006 and December 2008, were included. All patients had adverse risk (precluding the use of MA conditioning), which that was defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following features: (1) age >55 years; (2) Karnofsky performance score (KPS) ≤70; (3) hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) >2 (4) baseline diagnosis of Hodgkin disease (HD), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); and (5) prior history of autologous transplantation. This retrospective analysis was approved by the OSU institutional review board and Clinical Scientific Review Committee.

Quality Improvement Program 

As part of our continuous quality improvement program, we audit the rates of serious bacterial, fungal, and viral infections as well as rates of NRM on a quarterly and semiannual basis, respectively. We seek to maintain rates of serious infections (defined as cytomegalovirus (CMV)/Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation requiring preemptive therapy, bacteremias, or invasive fungal/viral/protozoal infections) below 50% and NRM below 15% at 1 year in recipients of RIC transplantation. Our standard of care (SOC) protocol for recipients of RIC transplantation and unrelated donor or mismatched allografts incorporated a total dose of ATG of 7.5 mg/kg (R-ATG) given over 3 days. When our quality review committee observed that these patients had rates of serious infections above 50% and NRM approaching or >15%, we made a programmatic decision to reduce the total dose of rabbit ATG to 6.0 mg/kg (r-ATG)and continued to monitor clinical events in these patients.

Conditioning Regimen, GVHD Prophylaxis, and Supportive Care 

The conditioning regimen consisted of i.v. Flu 30 mg/m² on days −7 to −3 (total dose; 150 mg/m²) and i.v. Bu 0.8 mg/kg/dose × 8 doses, on days −4 to −3 (total dose; 6.4 mg/kg) [21]. The first cohort of 39 consecutive patients received rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin^®, Genzyme; Cambridge, MA) (R-ATG group) at 2.5 mg/kg/day, on days −4 to −2 (total dose; 7.5 mg/kg). The second cohort of 33 patients (r-ATG) were given ATG at 2.0 mg/kg/day on the same schedule (total dose; 6.0 mg/kg).

All patients received standard prophylaxis of GVHD with tacrolimus (0.03 mg/kg/day i.v., commencing on day −2) and minidose methotrexate (MTX; 5 mg/m² on days +1, +3, +6, and +11) as previously described [22]. Blood levels of tacrolimus were monitored weekly until day +90 to maintain levels between 5 and 15 ng/mL. From day +90 onward tacrolimus was tapered at the discretion of the treating physician if no GVHD appeared.

All patients were treated in HEPA-filtered rooms, and received fungal (fluconazole, or posaconazole), herpes zoster/herpes simplex (intravenous acyclovir or oral valacyclovir), bacterial, and Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMX] or dapsone). Weekly monitoring for CMV and EBV reactivation by quantitative RT-PCR was conducted. Preemptive ganciclovir or valganciclovir were administered to patients with CMV reactivation (defined as ≥4000 copies/mL, reconfirmed within 24 hours from initial detection); preemptive single i.v. dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) was administered to all patients with evidence of EBV reactivation (defined as ≥4000 copies/ml, reconfirmed within 24 hours from initial detection). EBV PCR was rechecked 1 week after rituximab administration. For patients with negative EBV PCR at this stage, no further rituximab doses were given, whereas patients with increasing or persistently positive EBV PCR received 3 additional weekly rituximab doses. Urine and/or serum BK-virus PCR was obtained in all suspected cases of hemorrhagic cystitis. The time of neutrophil engraftment was considered the first of 3 successive days with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L after posttransplantation nadir; the time of platelet engraftment was considered the first of 3 consecutive days with platelet count ≥20 × 10⁹/L, in the absence of platelet transfusion.

GVHD Assessment and Treatment 

Patients achieving neutrophil engraftment were evaluable for acute GVHD (aGVHD (acute GVHD)) that was graded using standard criteria [23]. Patients were evaluable for chronic GVHD (cGVHD) if engraftment occurred and the patient survived for 100 days posttransplantation. The diagnoses of cGVHD and extensive cGVHD were made as previously described 24, 25, 26. Corticosteroids comprised the first-line therapy of acute (grade II-IV) and extensive cGVHD. Second-line treatment was at the discretion of treating physicians and included mycophenolate mofetil, extracorporeal photopheresis, and infliximab.

Statistical Analysis 

Baseline categoric variables were compared by using Fisher's exact test, whereas continuous variables were compared by Wilcoxon rank-sum test or 2-sample t-test as appropriate. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS was defined as the time from transplant to death, and surviving patients were censored at last follow-up. PFS was defined as the time from transplantation to disease progression/relapse and/or death. OS and PFS data were analyzed by the log-rank test. NRM was defined as death from any cause other than disease progression or relapse. Cumulative incidences of NRM and relapse were calculated with relapse or death as a competing event, respectively [27]. Comparisons between estimates of cumulative incidence were made by using the Gray's test. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD or cGVHD was calculating with relapse or death without relapse or GVHD as competing events 20, 27. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for a cumulative incidence of aGVHD, cGVHD, or NRM, relapse, and for OS and PFS, using a limited backward selection procedure. Variables considered in the model were those significant at α = 0.20 level from the univariable models. Variables remaining in the final models were significant at α = 0.05 level. Estimates for hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained for each significant prognostic factor. All P-values are 2 sided. All analyses were run using Stata 10.1, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX. P-values based on Gray's test were estimated using R-project version 2.8.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Patient Characteristics 

The baseline characteristics of 72 consecutive patients included in this analysis are shown in Table 1. The 2 ATG groups did not differ significantly for age, histologic diagnosis, donor source, KPS, comorbidity scores, donor/recipient CMV status, and stem-cell dose infused. Approximately 25% of the patients in each group received allografts from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors. More patients in the r-ATG group had high-risk disease at the time of transplantation (P = .02), whereas a higher proportion of R-ATG patients received filgrastim (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) to promote neutrophil engraftment (P = .001). Routine use of G-CSF administration following allografting was discontinued at our center (in October 2006), after the publication of large registry data showing no improvement in allogeneic transplantation outcomes with growth factor administration [28].

Table 1. Patient Characteristics at the Time of Transplantation

	ATG (7.5 mg/kg) N = 39	ATG (6 mg/kg) N = 33	P-Value
Median age; years (range)	56 (24-70)	55 (24-69)	.66
Male (%)	71.8	63.6	.61
Diagnosis
AML/MDS	18 (46.2%)	9 (27.3%)	.06
NHL/Hodgkin disease	12 (30.8%)	9 (27.3%)
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia	4 (10.3%)	12 (36.4%)
Others	5 (12.8%)	3 (9.1%)
Disease risk‡
Standard risk	11 (28%)	2 (6%)	.02
High risk	28 (72%)	31 (94%)
Prior autografting	6 (15%)	1 (3%)	.11
Donors
Sibling	5 (12.8%)	3 (9.1%)	.71
Unrelated	34 (87.2%)	30 (90.9%)
Degree of HLA match
8/8 match∗	31 (79%)	29 (87%)	.34
10/10 match†	29 (74%)	25 (75%)	.99
Median KPS; (range)	90 (70-100)	90 (80-100)	.17
Median HCT-CI; (range)	1 (0-4)	2 (0-4)	.11
Cytomegalovirus status
Patient and/or donor seropositive	27 (69.2%)	22 (66.7%)	.99
Both patient and donor seronegative	12 (30.8%)	11 (33.3%)
Graft source
Bone marrow	4 (10.3%)	—	.12
Peripheral blood stem cells	35 (89.7%)	33 (100%)
Patients receiving G-CSF	29 (74.4%)	11 (33.3%)	.001
Median CD34+ cell dose (106 cells/kg recipient), (range)	7.02 (0.69-10.2)	7.2 (2.13-10.0)	.93
Median CD3+ cell dose (107 cells/kg recipient) (range)	2.33 (0.19-4.24)	2.32 (0.45-4.83)	.64

AML indicates acute myelogenous leukemia; ATG. antithymocyte globulin; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; KPS, Karnofsky performance score; HCT-CI, Hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Engraftment and Chimerism 

Median time to neutrophil engraftment was significantly longer in the r-ATG group compared to the R-ATG group (18 vesus 15 days; P = .01), likely because of the omission of G-CSF in the r-ATG group (Table 2). A trend for longer median time to platelet engraftment was seen in R-ATG group compared to the r-ATG group (17.5 versus 15 days; P = .06). One patient each in both groups experienced secondary graft failure, which resolved with G-CSF administration. One R-ATG patient had secondary graft rejection, with no such events observed in the r-ATG group. Primary graft failure was not observed. Rates of complete donor-cell chimerism at days +30, +60, +180, and +360 for R-ATG patients were 59%, 63%, 84%, and 91%, respectively, and for r-ATG patients were 43%, 78%, 92%, and 100%, respectively (P = NS).

Table 2. Engraftment Kinetics and Donor-Cell Chimerism Posttransplantation

	ATG (7.5 mg/kg)	ATG (6 mg/kg)	P-Value
Neutrophil engraftment (days), median (range)	15 (12-20)	18 (8-32)	.01
Platelet engraftment (days), median (range)	17.5 (10-292)	15 (10-49)	.06
Secondary graft failure	1	1	.99
Secondary graft rejection	1	—	NA
Day +30 chimerism; median
T cell	97%	91.5%	.15
Myeloid	100%	100%	.78
Day +90 chimerism; median
T cell	99%	100%	.24
Myeloid	100%	100%	.76
Day +180 chimerism; median
T cell	100%	100%	.56
Myeloid	100%	100%	.03
Day +360 chimerism; median
T cell	100%	100%	.84
Myeloid	100%	100%	.11

ATG indicates antithymocyte globulin.

GVHD 

All 72 patients were evaluable for aGVHD (Table 3). The median time to onset of aGVHD was 44 days and 38 days for the R-ATG and r-ATG groups, respectively. While accounting for competing events, the day +120-cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 32% for R-ATG group and 27% for r-ATG group (P = .73) (Figure 1A). The day +120-cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD for R-ATG patients and r-ATG patients was 23% and 11%, respectively (P = .28) (Figure 1B). On univariate analysis, baseline diagnosis of lymphoma (Hodgkin [HL] and non-Hodgkin [NHL]) was the only variable associated with aGVHD (HR = 3.44; 95% CI = 1-11; P = .04).

Table 3. Assessment of Graft-versus-Host Disease According to Dose of Antithymocyte Globulin Used

	ATG (7.5 mg/kg) N = 39	ATG (6 mg/kg) N = 33	P-Value
Rates of acute GVHD∗; %(N)
Grade I-IV	41% (16)	48.4% (16)	.52
Grade II-IV	30.7% (12)	24.2% (8)	.53
Grade III-IV	20.5% (8)	9% (3)	.17
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at day +120† (%)
Grade II-IV	27%	32%	.73
Grade III-IV	23%	11%	.28
Rates of chronic GVHD;∗ %(N)
Overall chronic GVHD	44.1% (15)	44.8% (13)	.95
Limited chronic GVHD	8.8% (3)	31% (9)	.02
Extensive chronic GVHD	35.2% (12)	13.7% (4)	.05
Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at day +400† (%)
Overall chronic GVHD	44%	61%	.09
Limited chronic GVHD	9%	44%	.01
Extensive chronic GVHD	40%	34%	.89

GVHD indicates graft-versus-host disease; ATG, antithymocyte globulin.

• 
  • View Large Image
  • Download to PowerPoint

• Figure 1 

  Cumulative incidence of GVHD according to the ATG dosage group. (A) cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD. (B) Cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD. (C) Cumulative incidence of cGVHD. (D) Cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD. Solid curves represent patients receiving ATG at 6.0 mg/kg, whereas the dashed curves represent patients getting the 7.5 mg/kg ATG dose.

Sixty-three patients surviving for at least 100 days posttransplantation were evaluable for cGVHD (R-ATG group = 34, r-ATG group = 29) (Table 3). The median time to onset of cGVHD for R-ATG and r-ATG groups was 207 days and 160 days respectively. The day +400-cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 44% (n = 15) for R-ATG group and 61% (n = 13) for r-ATG group (P = .09) (Figure 1C). The day +400-cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD for the patients in R-ATG group versus those in the r-ATG groups was 40% (n = 12) versus 34% (n = 4), respectively (P = .89) (Figure 1D). On univariable analysis, baseline diagnosis of CLL was the only variable associated with cGVHD (HR = 2.82; 95% CI = 1-7.8; P = .04).

Infectious Complications 

Compared to the R-ATG group, the patients in the r-ATG group had significantly fewer episodes of CMV reactivations (64.1% versus 30.3%; P = .005) and bacterial infections (56.4% versus 18.2%; P = .001) (Table 4). There was a nonsignificant trend to less BK-virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis in the r-ATG cohort compared to R-ATG patients (9.1% versus 25.6%; P = .12) (Table 4). In the R-ATG group 2 patients developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), and 2 additional patients developed adenoviral infections, whereas no such events were seen in the r-ATG group. Three and 1 invasive fungal infections were reported in the R-ATG and r-ATG patients, respectively.

Table 4. Infectious Complications Postallogeneic Transplantation

CMV indicates cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; ATG, antithymocyte globulin.

NRM and Relapse Rate 

Median follow-up of surviving patients following HSCT is 15 months. The day 100-cumulative incidence of NRM rate was significantly lower in r-ATG group compared to R-ATG group (0% versus 7.7%; P = .03). Similarly, the 1-year cumulative incidence of NRM was significantly lower in r-ATG group compared to R-ATG group (3% versus 18%; P = .03) (Figure 2A). On univariate analysis, no other clinical variable was significantly associated with NRM risk. Causes of NRM are listed in Table 5.

• 
  • View Large Image
  • Download to PowerPoint

• Figure 2 

  (A) Cumulative incidence of NRM according to the ATG dosage group. (B) Cumulative incidence of disease relapse according to the ATG dosage group. Solid curves represent patients receiving ATG at 6.0 mg/kg, whereas the dashed curves represent patients getting the 7.5 mg/kg ATG dose.

Table 5. Causes of Nonrelapse mortality According to Dose of Antithymocyte Globulin Administered

ATG indicates antithymocyte globulin; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease.

At last follow-up 20 patients relapsed (R-ATG = 12; r-ATG = 8). The cumulative incidence of relapse for R-ATG and r-ATG patients was not significantly different (P = .85); the 1- and 2-year rates for the 2 groups were 28% versus 25% and 25% versus 31%, respectively (Figure 2B). On univariate analysis baseline diagnosis of CLL (HR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.01-0.68; P = .02) was the only factor associated with the relapse risk.

OS and PFS 

At last follow-up 49 patients were alive (R-ATG group = 21, r-ATG group = 28). Patients in the r-ATG group showed a trend for better 1-year OS compared to patients in the R-ATG group (84% versus 64%; log-rank P = .07) (Figure 3A; online only); the 2-year expected OS rates were 84% and 55%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified rabbit ATG dose (HR = 2.40; P-value = 0.08), baseline diagnosis of CLL (HR = 0.11; p-value = 0.03), and KPS ≥90 (HR = 0.50; P-value = 0.09) as variables of interest for multivariable analysis. However, none of these variables demonstrated independent prognostic significance on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P > .05). The expected 1-year PFS rates were 53% and 71% for patients in R-ATG group and those in r-ATG group, respectively (log-rank P = .12) (Figure 3B; online only). The corresponding estimates of 2-year PFS rates were 42% and 71%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, baseline diagnosis of CLL (HR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.02-0.45; P = .003) and KPS ≥90 (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.85-0.97; P = .008) were the only factors independently associated with a better PFS.

• 
  • View Large Image
  • Download to PowerPoint

• Figure 3 

  OS and PFS according to ATG dosage group. (A) Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS following allogeneic transplantation, (B) Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS following allogeneic transplantation. Solid curves represent patients receiving ATG at 6.0 mg/kg, whereas the dashed curves represent patients getting the 7.5 mg/kg ATG dose.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

As part of our continuous quality improvement program, we sought to reduce the risk of infectious complications and NRM observed in recipients of mostly unrelated RIC allografts by means of a planned dose reduction of rabbit ATG associated with our SOC protocol. We then retrospectively analyzed the impact of this modest ATG dose reduction on clinical outcomes and have made several interesting observations. First, our data support that a relatively small ATG dose reduction to 6 mg/kg had no deleterious effect on engraftment kinetics or donor chimerism. Second, the lower ATG dose did not appear to increase the risk of either aGVHD or cGVHD. Third, the dose reduction was associated with significantly less viral and bacterial infections. These results ultimately translated into a reduction in NRM and similar OS and PFS for patients that received the lower dose of ATG compared with those that received the higher dose. These findings we feel validate the importance of continuous quality monitoring associated with blood and marrow transplant programs.

Over the last 2 decades, various investigators have reported encouraging transplantation outcomes with the inclusion of ATG in transplant conditioning regimens 6, 9, 29, 30, 31, whereas others have reported comparable transplantation results without the use of ATG 32, 33. These divergent data have created considerable controversy about the role (if any) and indications of ATG use with allogeneic HSCT. The lack of randomized data addressing the role of ATG with transplant conditioning has been the key factor fueling this controversy for decades. Recently, a phase III trial, reported in abstract form only [34], has shown significant reduction in the rates of aGVHD and cGVHD for patients randomized to receiving ATG with transplant conditioning. This key study supports the use of ATG, at least for patients receiving unrelated donor allografts following MA conditioning.

ATG prevents development of GVHD, not only through in vivo donor effector TCD, but also via pleiotropic effects on the immune system including depletion and modulation of antigen presenting cells, modulation of cell surface molecules that mediate leukocyte/endothelium interactions and induction of regulatory T cells 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40. In addition to dose intensity, the efficacy of ATG in preventing GVHD is intricately dependent on the type of ATG preparation used and on the timing of ATG administration before HSCT 1, 17, 41. Unfortunately, in the majority of the studies assessing ATG dose intensity, different ATG doses were administered on different schedules, making interpretation of the efficacy results difficult 6, 17, 20. Thus, in our study, when we elected to reduce the 7.5 mg/kg total dose of rabbit ATG in patients undergoing RIC HSCT, we decided to keep the ATG preparation and administration schedule uniform, to facilitate comparison of the 2 ATG dose levels. This allowed us to investigate the impact of an apparently lower ATG dose on GVHD control rates, graft function, infection, and other transplantation outcomes.

Numerous studies have shown the efficacy of ATG for GVHD prophylaxis 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 31, 42. However, higher ATG doses (thymoglobulin dose-equivalents ≥7.5-15 mg/kg) have been associated with increased risk of relapse, infectious complications, and NRM 8, 31, 43. Despite these data, only a handful of studies have attempted to define the optimal dose intensity of ATG. Bacigalupo et al. [6] reported outcomes of patients receiving either 15 mg/kg or 7.5 mg/kg of ATG (along with MA conditioning) compared to patients not receiving thymoglobulin. Although no direct dose comparisons were planned in that study, rates of aGVHD appeared worse (69%) with the lower 7.5 mg/kg ATG dose, compared to the higher 15 mg/kg dose (37%). However, the 15 mg/kg ATG was associated with significantly more lethal infectious complications.

Meijer et al. [18] compared progressively lower doses of ATG (8 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg) in patients undergoing NA HSCT, and reported significantly higher rates of aGVHD and trends toward higher rates of cGVHD with the lower ATG doses. A limitation of this study, however, was the relatively small number of patients receiving the lower 4 mg/kg (n = 9) and 6 mg/kg (n = 13) ATG dose. In contrast, Ayuk et al. [17] reported no difference in aGVHD and cGVHD rates in patients receiving 2 different doses of ATG-Fresenius (30 mg/kg versus 60 mg/kg) with MA conditioning. In the only series comparing ATG dose intensity in patients undergoing (matched sibling) RIC-HSCT, Mohty et al. [20] observed a significant increase in rates of aGVHD and cGVHD when ATG dose was reduced from ≥7.5 mg/kg to 2.5 mg/kg. Our analysis, in contrast, shows that a less aggressive ATG dose reduction may not compromise aGVHD control. This is a potentially important observation given that most of our patients received allografts from unrelated donors, had high-risk disease at baseline, and approximately a quarter of the patients received transplants from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors.

Significantly fewer r-ATG patients in our analysis received G-CSF postallografting, which may explain acceptable aGVHD control rates in this group. It must be pointed out, however, that although some studies suggest an increased risk of aGVHD with post-HSCT G-CSF administration [44], others have found no such association 28, 45. Moreover, in our analyses G-CSF was not independently associated with an increased risk of aGVHD (P = .63). We also found no negative correlation between attainment of full donor chimerism and lower ATG dose. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was longer in the r-ATG patients, which is likely because of less frequent use of G-CSF in this group.

In our study, the higher 7.5 mg/kg ATG dose was associated with frequent CMV reactivations, bacterial infections, and lethal infectious complications, leading to significantly higher NRM rates. However, unlike previous studies, where the benefit of fewer infectious complications attained with lower ATG doses (2.5-4 mg/kg) was offset by unacceptable rates of GVHD 18, 20, 43, we demonstrated here that “conservative” ATG dose deescalation to 6 mg/kg can significantly reduce the rates of infectious events and NRM while maintaining acceptable GVHD control rates. The 1-year NRM rate of 3% in the r-ATG cohort is encouraging, especially when considering the high-risk characteristics of patients included at baseline.

In summary, our findings suggest that for patients undergoing RIC HSCT, a total dose of ATG as low as 6 mg/kg dose appears to be associated with significantly fewer infectious complications and lower rates of NRM, without compromising GVHD control or survival when compared to higher administered doses. Our data highlight the fact that the relative ATG dose intensity has significant impact on transplantation outcomes, underscoring the need to systematically determine and employ the ATG dose with “best” therapeutic index, not only in clinical practice, but also in future clinical trials. We must acknowledge that these findings were made in the context of a quality improvement effort rather than a prospective hypothesis driven research protocol. It also involved a heterogeneous group of high-risk patients. Nevertheless, the present study is one of the larger analyses that have attempted to address the question of defining the best therapeutic index for ATG in patients undergoing HSCT. Based on our analysis, we conclude that validation of these results would be warranted in a larger, prospective trial evaluating the impact of varying doses of ATG.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgments 

This work was presented in part as an oral presentation at the 2009 ASBMT Tandem Meetings, Tampa, FL (abstract #9).

Financial disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Back to Article Outline

References 

1. Bacigalupo A, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, et al. Prophylactic antithymocyte globulin reduces the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease in alternative-donor bone marrow transplants. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8:656–661
   • View In Article
2. Ferrara JL, Levy R, Chao NJ. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute graft-vs.-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1999;5:347–356
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (213 KB)
   • CrossRef
3. Hamadani M, Awan FT, Devine SM. The impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition on the incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease in patients with acute leukemia undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Blood. 2008;111:3901–3902
   • View In Article
   • CrossRef
4. Lee KH, Lee JHs, Lee JH, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation from an HLA-mismatched familial donor is feasible without ex vivo-T cell depletion after reduced-intensity conditioning with busulfan, fludarabine, and antithymocyte globulin. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:61–72
   • View In Article
5. Marmont AM, Horowitz MM, Gale RP, et al. T-cell depletion of HLA-identical transplants in leukemia. Blood. 1991;78:2120–2130
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
6. Bacigalupo A, Lamparelli T, Bruzzi P, et al. Antithymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in transplants from unrelated donors: 2 randomized studies from Gruppo Italiano Trapianti Midollo Osseo (GITMO). Blood. 2001;98:2942–2947
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Basara N, Baurmann H, Kolbe K, et al. Antithymocyte globulin for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: results from the multicenter German cooperative study group. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;35:1011–1018
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Bredeson CN, Zhang MJ, Agovi MA, et al. Outcomes following HSCT using fludarabine, busulfan, and thymoglobulin: a matched comparison to allogeneic transplants conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:993–1003
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (209 KB)
   • CrossRef
9. Duggan P, Booth K, Chaudhry A, et al. Unrelated donor BMT recipients given pretransplant low-dose antithymocyte globulin have outcomes equivalent to matched sibling BMT: a matched pair analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;30:681–686
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Kroger N, Zabelina T, Kruger W, et al. In vivo T cell depletion with pretransplant anti-thymocyte globulin reduces graft-versus-host disease without increasing relapse in good risk myeloid leukemia patients after stem cell transplantation from matched related donors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29:683–689
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
11. Nash RA, Antin JH, Karanes C, et al. Phase 3 study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus with methotrexate and cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from unrelated donors. Blood. 2000;96:2062–2068
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
12. Juckett M, Rowlings P, Hessner M, et al. T cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinical and molecular follow-up. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21:893–899
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
13. Levine JE, Paczesny S, Mineishi S, et al. Etanercept plus methylprednisolone as initial therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2008;111:2470–2475
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
14. Hamadani M, Hofmeister CC, Jansak B, et al. Addition of infliximab to standard acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following allogeneic peripheral blood cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:783–789
    • View In Article
15. Peggs KS, Sureda A, Qian W, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: impact of alemtuzumab and donor lymphocyte infusions on long-term outcomes. Br J Haematol. 2007;139:70–80
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
16. Khouri IF, McLaughlin P, Saliba RM, et al. Eight-year experience with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed follicular lymphoma after nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Blood. 2008;111:5530–5536
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
17. Ayuk F, Diyachenko G, Zabelina T, et al. Comparison of two doses of antithymocyte globulin in patients undergoing matched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:913–919
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (277 KB)
    • CrossRef
18. Meijer E, Cornelissen JJ, Lowenberg B, Verdonck LF. Antithymocyte globulin as prophylaxis of graft failure and graft-versus-host disease in recipients of partially T-cell-depleted grafts from matched unrelated donors: a dose-finding study. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:1026–1030
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (115 KB)
    • CrossRef
19. Remberger M, Svahn BM, Mattsson J, Ringden O. Dose study of thymoglobulin during conditioning for unrelated donor allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2004;78:122–127
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
20. Mohty M, Bay JO, Faucher C, et al. Graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplantation from HLA-identical sibling with antithymocyte globulin-based reduced-intensity preparative regimen. Blood. 2003;102:470–476
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
21. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood. 1998;91:756–763
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
22. Przepiorka D, Ippoliti C, Khouri I, et al. Tacrolimus and minidose methotrexate for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease after matched unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood. 1996;88:4383–4389
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
23. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–828
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
24. Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med. 1980;69:204–217
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (4599 KB)
    • CrossRef
25. Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol. 1991;28:250–259
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
26. Farmer ER. The histopathology of graft-versus-host disease. Adv Dermatol. 1986;1:173–188
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
27. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
28. Khoury HJ, Loberiza FR, Ringden O, et al. Impact of posttransplantation G-CSF on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2006;107:1712–1716
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
29. Byrne JL, Stainer C, Cull G, et al. The effect of the serotherapy regimen used and the marrow cell dose received on rejection, graft-versus-host disease and outcome following unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for leukaemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25:411–417
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
30. Finke J, Bertz H, Schmoor C, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors using in vivo anti-T-cell globulin. Br J Haematol. 2000;111:303–313
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
31. Russell JA, Turner AR, Larratt L, et al. Adult recipients of matched related donor blood cell transplants given myeloablative regimens including pretransplant antithymocyte globulin have lower mortality related to graft-versus-host disease: a matched pair analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:299–306
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (266 KB)
    • CrossRef
32. Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen JA, et al. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: an update of the Seattle experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;26:397–404
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
33. Hansen JA, Gooley TA, Martin PJ, et al. Bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. N Eng J Med. 1998;338:962–968
    • View In Article
34. A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Phase III Trial comparing standard GvHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine and methotrexate with additional pretransplant ATG fresenius (ATG-F) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors—Finke et al. 112:57. ASH Annu Meet Abstr 2009.
    • View In Article
35. Mohty M. Mechanisms of action of antithymocyte globulin: T-cell depletion and beyond. Leukemia. 2007;21:1387–1394
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
36. Feng X, Kajigaya S, Solomou EE, et al. Rabbit ATG but not horse ATG promotes expansion of functional CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ regulatory T cells in vitro. Blood. 2008;111:3675–3683
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
37. Fang L, Fehse B, Engel M, Zander A, Kroger N. Antithymocyte globulin induces ex vivo and in vivo depletion of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Transplantation. 2005;79:369–371
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
38. Grullich C, Ziegler C, Finke J. Rabbit anti T-lymphocyte globulin induces apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cell compartments and leukemia cells, while hematopoetic stem cells are apoptosis resistant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:173–182
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (564 KB)
    • CrossRef
39. Beiras-Fernandez A, Walther S, Kaczmarek I, et al. In vitro influence of polyclonal anti-thymocyte globulins on leukocyte expression of adhesion molecules. Exp Clin Transplant. 2005;3:370–374
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
40. Haidinger M, Geyeregger R, Poglitsch M, et al. Antithymocyte globulin impairs T-cell/antigen-presenting cell interaction: disruption of immunological synapse and conjugate formation. Transplantation. 2007;84:117–121
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
41. Dominietto A, Van Lint MT, Gualandi F. Is timing of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)—pre and post hemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT)—relevant for graft vs host disease (GvHD)?. Blood. 2003;102:242a
    • View In Article
42. Crawley C, Szydlo R, Lalancette M, et al. Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Blood. 2005;106:2969–2976
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
43. Mohty M, Jacot W, Faucher C, et al. Infectious complications following allogeneic HLA-identical sibling transplantation with antithymocyte globulin-based reduced intensity preparative regimen. Leukemia. 2003;17:2168–2177
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
44. Ringden O, Labopin M, Gorin NC, et al. Treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia increases the risk of graft-versus-host disease and death: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:416–423
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
45. Ho VT, Mirza NQ, Junco Dd D, Okamura T, Przepiorka D. The effect of hematopoietic growth factors on the risk of graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32:771–775
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef