Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 710-716, May 2011

Platelet and Red Blood Cell Utilization and Transfusion Independence in Umbilical Cord Blood and Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplants

  • Melhem Solh

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Claudio Brunstein

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Shanna Morgan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Daniel Weisdorf

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests: Daniel Weisdorf, MD, Blood and Marrow Transplant Program,Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation,University of Minnesota, Mayo Mail Code 480; 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Received 16 July 2010; accepted 21 August 2010. published online 01 September 2010.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients have substantial transfusion requirements. Factors associated with increased transfusions and the extent of blood product use in umbilical cord blood (UCB) recipients are uncertain. We reviewed blood product use in 229 consecutive adult recipients of allogeneic HCT at the University of Minnesota: 147 with leukemia, 82 lymphoma or myeloma; 58% received unrelated UCB and 43% sibling donor peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts. Although neutrophil recovery was prompt (UCB median 17, range: 2-45 days, and PBSC 14, range: 3-34 days), only 135 of 229 (59% cumulative incidence) achieved red blood cell (RBC) independence and 157 (69%) achieved platelet independence by 6 months. Time to platelet independence was prolonged in UCB recipients (median UCB 41 versus PBSC 14 days) and in patients who had received a prior transplant (median 48 versus 32 days). Patients who received UCB grafts required more RBC through day 60 post-HCT (mean UCB 7.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-8.9) versus PBSC 5.2 (3.7-6.7) transfusions, P = .04), and more platelet transfusions (mean 25.2 (95% CI 22.1-28.2) versus 12.9 (9.4-16.4), P < .01) compared to PBSC recipients. Patients receiving myeloablative (MA) conditioning required more RBC and platelet transfusions during the first 2 months post-HCT compared to reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (7.4 versus 6.2, P = .30 for RBC; 23.2 versus 17.5, P = .07 for platelets). Despite prompt neutrophil engraftment, UCB recipients had delayed platelet recovery as well as more prolonged and costly blood product requirements. Enhanced approaches to accelerate multilineage engraftment could limit the transfusion-associated morbidity and costs accompanying UCB allotransplantation.

Key Words: Hematopoietic cell transplatation, Blood products in HCT, Platelet transfusion, RBC transfusion

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial disclosure: See Acknowledgments on page 715.

PII: S1083-8791(10)00366-6

doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.08.017

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 710-716, May 2011